Comments on: Lee Jeans Ad Featuring Lolita is “Porn-like”

By: Kim

Kim — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:27:17 +0000

Unbelievable explotation of women (again!) I would not wear this brand of jeans if that’s what they’re trying to sell. Discusting to any woman or girl that would want to look like this child-whore.

By: khaleelurrehmankhan

khaleelurrehmankhan — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:14:15 +0000

I LOVE WOMENS FITS

By: khaleelurrehmankhan

khaleelurrehmankhan — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:13:29 +0000

I WANT TO KNOW THE LATEST COLLECTION OF AUGUST 2008 OF MENS & WOMENS WITH PHOTO

By: Responsible

Responsible — Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:59:37 +0000

Come ON people, she’s obviously over 18, and are you telling me you’d rather have boring, formuliac, garbage ads…? I like looking at sexy, and so do teens… in fact… i do believe teens are known for liking sexy? am i mad here, or are your heads all just inside out!

Viva la sexy!

By: Derek

Derek — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 09:21:37 +0000

Yes, I would say there is indeed part of a nipple showing. And I agree, this is not an appropriate image to be displayed in a teen magazine. It is overly sexually sugestive; more so than a fully nude image of a woman in a natural pose would be. The most suggestive elements are, obviously, the lollipop, open shirt, open legs, and carefully placed “Lee”, which draws all attention to that area of the picture.

By: Ken Savage

Ken Savage — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 04:37:10 +0000

Do I see a nipple there?

By: Izzy

Izzy — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 06:53:21 +0000

I can’t believe nobody commented on this. That’s not an appropriate ad for a teen magazine or any magazine that would be perused by tyounger kids. But what do you expect from a place where padded bras are marketed to six year olds? (Can be found in Australian target stores)